The defendant in the Valodya Grigoryan case has given extraordinary testimony, claiming that he has never actually fired a shot and did not even know Valodya Grigoryan.
During the court hearing or interrogation, he provided details regarding the charges brought against him and a number of related circumstances. Specifically, he addressed incidents that occurred at the police station, stating that he was given water in a cola bottle, and also spoke about traces of gasoline on the cola bottle and the possibility of a DNA match.
In addition, he stated that he provided the code and remained seated for fourteen hours straight, adding that he had the opportunity to go to Narek Ohanyan's house but consciously chose not to, although he admitted to taking the clutch bag. These statements seriously highlight new circumstances in the case that still need to be verified by law enforcement agencies.
Such contradictory and notable statements emerging in this case indicate that the pre-trial and judicial proceedings will have rather complex developments. The details presented by the defendant—ranging from the lack of weapon use to everyday, routine episodes—require strict professional and factual verification.
Particularly noteworthy are the claims regarding incidents at the police station, which typically become the subject of serious legal disputes between the parties. Upcoming hearings will clarify the extent to which these testimonies are substantiated and sufficient to change the overall picture of the case.
